Emotional well-being essential for journalists’ sanity and safety: TV reporters

PPF Secretary General Owais Aslam Ali in a group discussion regarding safety of TV journalists

Karachi, Jan 18 (PPI):  Majority of journalists witness traumatic events and should get regular psychological counseling and medical check-ups to ensure their physical as well as psycho-social safety and productivity. Media houses also need to develop implementation of safety protocols in the field and anti-sexual harassment policies for female journalists.

These were some of the key points raised at the round table discussion on ‘Safety of Television Journalists,’ organized by the Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) in collaboration with the Open Society Institute (OSI) here.

PPF Secretary General Owais Aslam Ali in group photo with participants of workshop on "Safety of TV Journalists." (S. Imran Ali/PPI)
PPF Secretary General Owais Aslam Ali in a group photo with participants of workshop on “Safety of TV Journalists.” (S. Imran Ali/PPI)

The discussion, attended by television journalists from across Pakistan  is part of a series of consultations with electronic, print, radio and digital journalists as well as other stakeholders to improve the safety of media professionals.

Journalists agreed that they themselves need to take steps to ensure their safety. Impartiality in reporting, clear distinction between activism and journalism, editorial discretion, cultural sensitivity, and awareness of safety measures were cited as key factors.

The role of media houses and owners also came under scrutiny during the discussion as participants pointed out issues including inadequate compensation, lack of medical coverage, job insecurity, focus on ‘breaking news,’ lack of safety equipment, unprofessional and underpaid support staff were cited as some of their biggest failings.

TV journalists demanded adequate and timely compensation for district reporters as well; regular arrangement of awareness sessions on hostile environment, first-aid, medical coverage; proper safety gear.  One of the participants suggested use of equipment like drones for coverage of dangerous assignments such as fires in buildings.

Participants also discussed the role of other stakeholders like press clubs, journalists’ unions, the government, law-enforcement agencies in improving safety standards.

Press clubs need to weed out non-journalists from their member base as such individuals’ compromise credibility and safety of actual journalists. Press clubs should also open or resume induction of new members to increase unity and ensure safety of journalists. Regular medical camps also need to be arranged by press clubs for journalists, and there shouldn’t be nepotism or favoritism in the selection of journalists for training.

The government was cited as another key stakeholder that can improve and ensure journalists’ safety. Implementing labor laws, monitoring safety measures in media houses, investigating attacks on media, and passing effective safety bill are some of the areas where the government can play a key role. Identifying and banning dummy publications will also greatly improve safety standards, it was discussed. The government also needs to properly investigate attacks on media and journalists to bring an end to the culture of impunity.

Journalists, media houses and unions should also focus on better coordination with the government and law-enforcement agencies to improve communication and better understand one another’s point of view. Law-enforcement agencies also need to properly investigate and prosecute cases of attacks against journalists.

Female political mobilisation

Women’s representation in parliment

By: Zamurrad Awan

Although Pakistan has a considerably long history of political mobilisation, sit-ins and mass movements, historically they were monopolised by the male section of society. Few women took part in such activities and even then, elderly female members of political parties took part in political deliberations as silent spectators, where they ventured to be part of the audience, devoid of motivation, quietly taking notes or exchanging conversation. A new trend was witnessed during the judicial movement in 2007 where women lawyers in black coats came out in large numbers with enthusiasm and vigour. These sloganeering lawyers demonstrated that women have the potential to become equal partners in Pakistan’s political landscape.

The real change, however, came during the political events of August 2014 that were organised by Imran Khan of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) and Tahirul Qadri of the Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT), namely their so-called Independence March and Revolution March respectively. Their dharnas (sit-ins) in Islamabad and subsequently well attended public meetings in various cities of the country introduced a new style of mobilisation through raising slogans of ‘change’. The consequent female involvement in these political events can be seen as a healthy sign, since women constitute half of the country’s population. Historically, female political participation in Pakistan was restricted to casting votes during elections. By contrast, the recent involvement of women in politics was multifarious, ranging from expressing opinions to registering active protests and demanding better governance.

The increased female mobilisation during recent political events signifies their growing awareness about political affairs, freedom of expression and their motivation to participate. These factors enable them to feel like stakeholders. Apart from awareness among the female population, increased mobilisation equally determines changed attitudes in the male population, who are encouraging their female family members to participate in protests, which was previously a far fetched thought. Change was not restricted to participation but also incorporates the enthusiasm and spirit of the crowd, including women, as mentioned above.

It is a new phenomenon that girls of all ages, especially from the lower and middle income social classes, are participating with enthusiasm, displaying political slogans and allegiances in the form of caps and flags quite openly. They appear spirited, motivated and politically sensitised. Young women who support the PTI, mostly from the upper and middle class, by dancing to national songs are registering their protest. Similarly the female supporters of the PAT raised their demands through slogans. Contrary to past political gatherings, both parties arranged for music consisting of political and national songs to create extra enthusiasm. At the PTI sit-ins, the youthful participants, including boys and girls, hopped and swayed to the beat of specially sung motivational songs by famous singers like Abrarul Haq and Attaullah Khan Essakhailvi. At PAT gatherings, religious and folk songs motivated young participants, including women, which gave this sit-in a more spiritual touch.

The commonality between the women supporters of both parties is their clarity in objectives which they expressed by being vocal during their interviews, thus becoming the centre of attention for print, electronic and social media. Irrespective of whether these political marches attain their agendas, the fact remains that particularly in an environment where women face various kinds of abuses and discrimination (not only in the domestic but also in the public sphere), this kind of mobilisation, irrespective of political affiliation, is in itself a great achievement and to the benefit of the social and political health of the nation. The involvement of females in political events has also changed the dynamics of politics in the country. Most political parties have always focused on males as their supporters and party workers, but now realise that no political movement can be successful unless it is also supported by women. Imran Khan and Tahirul Qadri, on a number of occasions credited the active participation of women. Khan called the women participants “tigresses” while Qadri endorsed their contribution by calling them “braver than the male participants”.

On the other hand, the increased female mobilisation in political protests is being condemned by the forces of orthodoxy and the status quo, who say female participation is a means to spread ‘vulgarity’.

These opponents are those who believe that a woman’s work is to facilitate the requirements of her male family members within the four walls of the home. On October 23, the head of the JUI-F, Maulana Fazlur Rehman, during his address to the people of Quetta criticised women participants at the PTI gathering in Islamabad by calling the event a mujra (dance party), which was strongly refuted by the leaders of the parties at the sit-ins. The PTI’s Central Information Secretary, Dr Shireen Mazari, condemned the remarks in a press release in which she stated: “The PTI, especially its women, will not tolerate such abuse and he [Maulana Fazlur Rahman] should be ashamed of the filthy language he is using against those women of Pakistan who are part of the PTI. As a woman I find his language unacceptable and reflective of a tainted mindset.”

Whatever the forces of orthodoxy think about this kind of female participation, we cannot neglect the fact that these political events are an important agent of change and have reshaped the traditional political role of women, beginning with their active mobilisation. This kind of female participation could be considered the first step towards their political empowerment, enhancing their capability to grasp knowledge and enabling them to register their protest in a more effective and vocal way.

The writer is a lecturer at the department of political science FC College University, Lahore

Daily Times

Pakistani schools network observes anti-Malala day

ISLAMABAD: An association of Pakistani schools held an “I am not Malala” day on Monday, condemning young Nobel peace laureate Malala Yousafzai for what it called her support for controversial novelist Salman Rushdie.

Education campaigner Malala was shot in the head by the Taliban in October 2012 but recovered and went on to win this year’s Nobel peace prize.

The 17-year-old has been hailed around the world for standing up for girls’ rights to education, but the response to her in Pakistan has not been universally positive, with some seeing her as a “Western agent” on a mission to shame her country.

The All Pakistan Private Schools Federation last year barred its members from buying Malala’s memoir “I am Malala” because of what the group said was its “anti-Pakistan and anti-Islam content.“

Read more: Pakistani private schools ban Malala’s book

It said the book, written with British journalist Christina Lamb, was too sympathetic to British novelist Salman Rushdie.

Rushdie in 1989 became the target of an Iranian fatwa, or religious edict, calling for his murder for allegedly blaspheming Islam and the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) in his book The Satanic Verses.

Mirza Kashif Ali, the president of the schools’ federation, said in a statement it was “clear that Malala has nexus with Salman Rushdie and Taslima Nasrin, and also has alignment with Salman Rushdie’s ideological club”.

“We severely condemned the chapter of the book in which Salman Rushdie’s book has been mentioned as freedom of expression by Malala while referring to father’s views,” Ali said.

He said walks, seminars and press conferences were held to highlight the “I am not Malala” day.

Bangladeshi author Nasrin was forced to flee her homeland in 1994 after radical Muslims accused her of blasphemy over her novel “Lajja” (Shame), in which a Hindu family is persecuted by Muslims.

Blasphemy is a sensitive issue in Pakistan also, where it can carry the death penalty.

Malala’s book describes her life under the Taliban’s brutal rule in northwest Pakistan’s Swat valley in the mid-2000s, hints at her ambition to enter Pakistani politics and even describes her father’s brief flirtation with Islamic fundamentalism as a youngster.

The book describes public floggings by the Taliban, their ban on television, dancing and music, and the family’s decision to flee Swat along with nearly one million others in 2009 amid heavy fighting between the militants and Pakistani troops.

Malala, who lives in Britain where she went for treatment after being shot, was jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in October alongside India’s 60-year-old Kailash Satyarthi for their championing of children’s rights.

DAWN

Plight of home-based workers highlighted

HYDERABAD: Home-based bangle workers observed the ‘World Day for Decent Work’ on Tuesday by holding a demonstration in Liaquat Colony under the aegis of the Home-based Women Workers Federation.

Attended by women working in bangle industry, the demo was led by Home-based Women Bangle Workers Union’s general secretary Jamil Abdul Latif and federation’s information secretary Shakeela Khan.

They told the workers about the significance of the day, saying that the day was observed internationally to see that all workers should be provided an environment which ensured equality, protection and dignity. As per International Labour Organisation’s definition of decent work, it is work which ensures adequate remuneration, protection at workplace, opportunities for promotion, freedom of expression, right to form union and equal opportunities for men and women.

But, they said, workers especially women working in informal sector did not have any rights.

They said women workers were used as fuel to increase profit even further. They were considered the cheapest labourers in the entire world especially in South Asian region.

DAWN

Book launch thwarted

IT is never advisable for governments to get into the business of banning books. And if the literature in question is written to counter the extremist narrative that is beginning to dominate, as Malala Yousafzai’s I am Malala attempts to do, then official obstructions to prevent the launch of such material can only be termed utterly appalling. As reported, the authorities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have thwarted the launch of Malala’s book which was supposed to take place yesterday at the University of Peshawar.

The PTI-led KP government apparently got cold feet as ministers and university officials pressured the organisers to cancel the event. The police, too, said they would be unable to provide security. This sets a disturbing precedent, especially when we consider that a seat of higher learning was involved. As one of the organisers observed, “It is against the spirit of freedom of expression and promotion of education”.

But there is an even graver problem. The KP government’s buckling under pressure reflects a sense of fear that is palpable across Pakistan — the fear of ‘offending’ the militants. The state is ceding more and more ground to the extremists, allowing them to decide what is and is not okay for public consumption. Such resignation and retreat on part of the state is unacceptable.

Malala has been feted by the world for her courageous stand against extremism and activism for women’s education. She has been welcomed in world capitals and august global forums. Should we not hang our heads in shame because she cannot be appreciated in her own country and province? Let us be clear: Malala is someone the people of KP can be proud of, a symbol of the potential of the troubled province’s youth. PTI chief Imran Khan has expressed disappointment at the cancellation of the launch. He would do well to convince the KP government to reschedule the event and facilitate it so that it goes ahead without a hitch.

DAWN