Unequal picture

BY: Geena Davis

WHAT do we learn about women and girls when we turn on the television or go to the movies? Around the world, female characters in films and television take far less space than male characters. They do less interesting things. They are judged by their appearance.

We all know that women and girls are slightly more than half the human population. But you would not know this from watching films and television, where there are roughly three male characters for every one female.

Less than a quarter of the on-screen global workforce is female — much lower than in the real world. Women are far less likely to be a judge or doctor or in any other professional or leadership position, and women and girls are twice as likely as men and boys to appear in sexualised attire or nude.

The time is now for media to make the future a reality — on-screen and off-screen.

These very enlightening and disturbingly bleak findings were part of the first-ever international study on the portrayal of women in films that my institute on Gender and Media commissioned from the USC Annenberg School of Communication and Journalism, and presented last year with the support of UN Women and the Rockefeller Foundation.

Our data are echoed by research on other types of media. The Global Media Monitoring Project found that only a quarter of the people heard or read about in print, radio and television news are women. Almost half of the stories uphold gender stereotypes.

Twenty years ago, at the Fourth World Conference on Women, the governments of the world committed to media making a far greater contribution to women’s empowerment, recognising that films, television, newspapers and now online platforms shape the ways we think — and act.

Yet despite this commitment, we still are far from a balanced representation or portrayal in the media. In fact, our research shows that the ratio of male to female characters in film has been exactly the same since 1946.

My colleagues in film and television used to think that the problem of gender equity had been fixed. But there was no data showing them the real picture. When I brought them the research I commissioned — covering a 20-year span — they were absolutely stunned to learn how bereft of female presence the fictitious worlds they were creating were.

I have stressed how important it is for future generations to have more female characters. We know that girls feel less empowered the more TV they watch, while boy’s views become more sexist. There are important ethical questions concerning stereotypes or hypersexual images to young children. No one thinks it is a positive development that, as one recent study found, girls as young as six are seeing themselves through the male gaze.

There is also an economic argument — research shows that films with more women and girls make more money, and are less likely to fail.

Maybe instead of developing unconscious gender biases and having to fix them, we can start from the beginning, as Beijing recognised, by not perpetuating them at all.

To achieve gender equality, we have to work on many issues — laws, education, representation in government — the list is long. But, media needs to be a particular priority because they have such an enormous impact on the ways that women, men, boys and girls think about their roles and their value to society. We cannot wait even one more year for progress. We know the problem, and we have the evidence confirming it.

Think about this: in all of the sectors of society that still have a huge gender disparity, how long will it take to correct, to reach parity? We can’t snap our fingers and suddenly half of congress is women. But there’s one category where the underrepresentation of women can be fixed tomorrow: on-screen.

In the time it takes to create a television show or to make a movie, we can change what the future looks like. In other words, we don’t have to wait for society to turn things around, we can create the future now, through what people see. Yes, there are woefully few women CEOs in the world, but lots of them can be women on screen. How long will it take to fix the problem of corporate boards being so unequal? Well, they can be half women tomorrow, in films and on TV.

Here’s a simple solution; cast more women in roles written for men. The time is now for media to make the future — where we have done away with gender bias — a reality today, on-screen.

The writer is an Academy and Golden Globe Award-winning actor and founder of the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media. The institute released the first-ever global study on female characters in popular films, in 2014, with support from UN Women and the Rockefeller Foundation.

Dawn

The Burka Avenger versus liberal patriarchy

The Burka Avenger versus liberal patriarchy

The cartoon series, “Burka Avenger”, is the story of a teacher, Jiya, who wears a stylised burka costume when in her superhero form. Using her martial arts skills, the Burka Avenger fights evil, mainly to defend her students and the school she teaches at, from patriarchal goons who want to shut the school down.
Not only was I impressed by the message of education for boys and girls, I was also pleasantly surprised by the choice of her costume — a black burka that covers her face and incorporates a cape. So, not only does she kick ass, she kicks ass without conforming to the mainstream view that attributes physical strength to masculinity only.

But while she’s being lauded as just what kids in Pakistan need, her burka is bothering people; specifically some liberal men. They see this as a promotion of the hijab and find it detrimental to the message of empowerment the show supposedly carries. To these men, ‘saving’ women from patriarchy means that the burka or any other form of hijab should be banned altogether or discouraged at the very least.

Hijab or burka, or whatever you might want to call it, is simply a tool. In and of itself, it doesn’t do anything. It’s like any other article of clothing. Some women feel happy walking around in thigh high shorts, some like to wear jeans, some prefer miniskirts and others want to wrap themselves up in dark and baggy garments that cover their entire bodies, including their faces — in essence, burkas and the sort.

Patriarchy is wrong not because it forces women to wear only the dark baggy garments and rejects everything else. It’s wrong because it interferes with a woman’s choice at all. It’s wrong because whether a woman wants to wear a burka or a bikini, she has the right to decide for herself as a human being — equal in standing with men.

So, when men give themselves the right to tell Jiya that she shouldn’t wear the burka to become a superhero, they’re assigning themselves the same patriarchal privileges that they are supposedly working against. What she should or shouldn’t wear and how it affects other women’s decision to wear or not wear the burka is for her and for other women to decide for themselves. Our job, as men, is to respect those choices personally and work to get everyone to do the same.

Dismantling patriarchy isn’t going to be achieved by opposing the tools of patriarchy alone, but rather by figuring out what motivates those tools and then not just taking them away from the abusers, but thoroughly cleansing ourselves off it as well. This means relinquishing our privileges and giving up the right to tell women what they should or should not wear or do with their bodies or souls. Afterwards, when women have made those choices, we should respect them and their choices. Discarding patriarchy must begin with us discarding our unjust privilege of forcing our opinion on women.

We can’t defeat the villain — patriarchy — if we still have residual villainy left in us.

And if we fail at defeating our inner villains, then maybe the Burka Avenger should tackle us as well.

Express Tribune

Former anchor reaches National Assembly body against PTV chief

By: Jamal Shahid

ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly Standing Committee on Human Rights on Tuesday set aside its 11-point routine agenda to discuss a legal dispute between a TV anchor and the managing director of PTV over their matrimonial status.

At the heart of the dispute is a minor boy which Ayesha Sana claims to be the son of PTV managing director Yousuf Baig Mirza but disowned by the latter.

Alleging that she had been wronged by her ex-husband Yousuf Baig Mirza, Ayesha has requested the committee to provide her justice after she exhausted all other avenues, including the court, where she filed the case for maintenance for the child in August 2011 and was still waiting for a decision.

The host of a morning show on PTV, she particularly sought recognition for her son she had with her former husband, the MD PTV, when they were married from June 21, 2003, till May 5, 2012. She also took up the issue of how she was illegally sacked from the PTV by its managing director.

Why the standing committee took up the case and how it would go about solving it was not clear especially when it did not have the jurisdiction to take up personal cases.
According to Tariq Mehmood, an advocate of Supreme Court, standing committees were not the forums to take up individual grievances.

“There are other forums for such matters. The standing committees cannot get sacked people reinstated. The maximum a committee can do is referring the case to the concerned department for consideration,” said Mr Mehmood.

Nonetheless, chairman of the committee MNA Riaz Fatyana said the committee had taken up the case since a woman’s rights at workplace had been violated by misusing authority. “And we will also look into the matter that the child was not denied his rights,” he said.

Ayesha’s case took up most of the time of the discussions although it was not in the meeting agenda. “Every single human right has been violated in her case,” said MNA Dr Attiay Inayatullah, adding that it was shameful that an educated and professional woman be treated in such a manner.

Ayesha had the support of all seven women parliamentarians. The meeting was informed that Ayesha married Yousuf Baig Mirza in June 2003. Both had married for the second time. “We were living in the UK for some time and then returned to Karachi, where I started hosting a morning show on PTV,” Ayesha told the meeting.

According to the former TV host, it was after 2006 that her husband started disowning their marriage and spreading the word that the two were no longer together. Her husband completely disassociated himself from her and the newborn son once she returned from the US after her delivery in November 2011.

“Yousuf Baig Mirza fired me from my job with PTV when he became the MD for the second time in 2007. Later in 2009, I was offered to host a morning show by PTV Lahore. But I was fired again when he became the MD of the state-owned channel in 2010 for the third time,” she told the MNAs.

She complained how no other channel was giving her work or helping project her story.“My press conference on July 19, 2012, in Lahore was ineffective. Despite heavy media representation, TV channels and newspapers did not highlight my case,” she said, alleging that her efforts to highlight her case on the social media were in one way or the other obstructed.

After Ayesha presented two thick files of evidence of her marriage with Yousuf Baig Mirza, MNA Riaz Fatyana read out loud the DNA report from the DNA Worldwide, UK, that said: “Based on analysis of test results, it is practically proven that Yousuf Baig Mirza is the biological father of the child Mohammad Mustafa Mirza.” MNA Fatyana directed the secretary of the committee to summon Yousuf Baig Mirza to the next meeting on January 9.

MNA Kashmala Tariq insisted that experts from the Federal Shariat Court or Council of Islamic Ideology be also invited for their opinion on the matter. Three out of the seven women parliamentarians, including Jamila Gillani, in the meeting rejected the idea of representation from religious offices.

“It is not advisable to involve the Council of Islamic Ideology or the Federal Shariat Court. This might worsen the case,” said MNA Gillani. Her request was turned down after MNA Riaz Fatyana took a vote on the issue. The committee will also invite medical experts from Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Pims) and the law division.


Dawn