Where we went wrong

Where we went wrong

By: ZUBEIDA MUSTAFA

IT was supposed to be an occasion to felicitate Malala on her birthday and use her speech at the UN Youth Assembly to inspire the audience. Party representatives were to be brought together on a common platform to renew their pledge to educate Pakistan’s children, especially girls.

In this context the South Asian Women in Media, with the support of the South Asian Free Media Association, took the step of convening a seminar on ‘Women’s education and terrorism’ at the Karachi Press Club the other day.

Regrettably, the seminar failed to achieve the objective it had set out to do. It became a forum for politicking rather than focusing on the issues at stake in education. I was hoping to hear the party representatives spell out the strategies they were planning to promote education in the country. Instead we heard a lot of loud talk extolling the virtues of education, as though we didn’t know. Do our leaders believe we still have to be persuaded about the advantages of education?

Since this was a seminar in honour of Malala and her brave stand against the Taliban, it also became an occasion for Taliban-bashing. One speaker very wittily said they should be called the Zaliman. How right she was. Another said that our society’s mindset had been Talibanised and that had endangered education. Correct again. This did not surprise anyone as the Taliban have emerged as the bête noire of the liberal section of Pakistani society. They have certainly harmed the country immensely. But they have to be dealt with in the national security context.

This tough talk took away the focus from education. The impression conveyed was that the education sector was all hunky dory before the Taliban entered the scene. The fact is that if education had been on the right track the Taliban could never have made the kind of headway they have made.

Those of us who predate the Taliban know very well that education has received a bad deal ever since Pakistan was created as a homeland for the Muslims. Inheriting the Macaulay tradition we failed to expand our education base fast enough for the common man while schools for the elite were given full support. Over the years there was a slide in the system till Z.A. Bhutto’s well-intended but poorly executed school and college nationalisation policy in 1972 came as the proverbial straw on the camel’s back.

There was no stopping after that. Ziaul Haq injected the pseudo-Islamic dimension which many were complaining about at the seminar. The decade of the nineties could not stop the slide and as commercialism was given a boost by the neo-liberal economics of that decade, education became the great divider. The only new factor that has come with the Taliban is that little Malalas are actually being shot at for going to school. Thank heavens for girls like Malala who show courage and refuse to be deterred.

What is actually disturbing is that this Taliban syndrome has become a smokescreen to conceal the malaise which has led to the collapse of our education system. What is not admitted generally is that this malaise preceded the Taliban.

Take the destruction of schools. Even before the local Taliban emerged on the scene, Pakistan’s education authorities had spawned the ghost school syndrome. This proved to be an insidious mode of destruction of schools and therefore more dangerous.

With school buildings in rural areas used as baithaks or cattle pens and school teachers in the employ of landowners, children were turned back from what were supposedly their schools. According to the last statistics quoted there were 12,000 ghost schools in Pakistan at one time. The Taliban have blown up about 500 schools and unwittingly spurred the girls into action. They still have to learn from our education authorities.

Even before the mindsets began to change so dangerously towards religious dogmatism in the Zia era, the ground had already been paved by the People’s Party government’s school nationalisation programme. Teaching posts were filled up with party activists whose main qualification was their loyalty to the party and not their commitment to education. Funds were siphoned off from the treasury to dole out their salaries.

The Sindh Education Minister, Nisar Khuhro, who was the chief guest at the seminar, immediately entered into a blame game saying that his government was being attacked when the original sin had been committed by military dictators. Why weren’t they being criticised, he wanted to know.

He also took a swipe at civil society and the indifference of parents towards their children’s education. It was unfair of the minister to blame parents when the majority of them are themselves uneducated. They deserve credit for accepting change and sending their children to school when they themselves had not been there.

Civil society, more the media, must share some of the blame as education for the underprivileged has never ranked high in their priorities. But that doesn’t exempt an incumbent government from its responsibility for which it made promises in its election manifesto and collected taxes from the people. Does it mean it will not act if it is not pushed by civil society? The PPP had a full five years in office to make a start.

What was disappointing about the seminar was that no clear-cut strategies were spelt out or commitment expressed to clean the Augean stables. Hadn’t we gathered for that?

Dawn

Scottish scholarships for Pakistani women

Scottish scholarships for Pakistani women

Islamabad: The Scottish government has announced scholarships for young women in Pakistan.The scholarship scheme is aimed at helping women from disadvantaged backgrounds to study at the master level in Pakistan universities, said a press release here.

The British Council Pakistan will administer the scheme and coordinate with the selected scholars. The Pakistan Scottish Scholarship Scheme will facilitate award-holders with tuition fee for master courses, university hostel costs, subsistence to the award-holder and travel to and from home to university, three times in a year.

Young women can avail this scholarship opportunity by applying for a master degree at any HEC recognised university of Pakistan in one areas sustainable energy, food security and agriculture and education.

The News

Gender equality, still a farfetched dream for women

Gender equality, still a farfetched dream for women

By: Fawad Hasan

KARACHI: When a nineteenth century philosopher observed that it was impossible to bring about any social change without the ‘feminine upheaval’, he left a point for the readers to ponder on and extract great lessons for generations to come. To right the wrongs of a society, the most disturbed, victimised segment will have to spearhead the movement of ‘social justice’ and ‘equality’. The country we live in is an abode of violence and suppression against women; hence, to change the current deplorable situation, the oppressed gender has to ‘raise’ the flag of freedom high.

According to a research conducted by the Aurat Foundation, an NGO working for the advocacy of women’s rights, in 2011 some 8,539 cases were reported under ‘violence against women’ charges. With a sharp increase of 7 percent during January and June 2012 alone, 4,585 cases were registered. Not to mention here that if our society encouraged women to file the cases having been assaulted or attacked, the number of registered incidents would have soared to a frightening number.

We as a nation have failed to neutralise ‘male chauvinism’, something our society is awash with. There is more to talk and write about the menace our women have to survive through. It is not only physical violence that women become victim to, but a ‘deep-rooted’ mentality of the stronger sex too inflicts non-physical violence against women. It is more excruciating, but regrettably, never makes to the headlines.

One of the largest educational institutes of Pakistan, University of Karachi, has around 60 departments falling under 8 faculties. KU literally is a ‘city within a city’, an academy currently educating 25,000 students, out of which more than 60 percent are females. But shockingly, the number of female students ‘shrinks’ as soon as the 3rd year of any programme begins and the marriage season kicks off. The degrees are then awarded and very few of these ‘social-principle-breakers’ struggle to get employment.

The trend stems from the morals, principles and man-made limitations that do not want women to participate in the overall progress of the society. The ‘progress’ is hampered deliberately lest the woman becomes equal to man whose superiority is holy and has been promised by god.

“I know I am wasting my time studying here. It is of no use since my cruel parents for whom I am a burden will marry me as soon as I graduate to a man who will then follow the legacy and will enslave me the way my parents did,” said a female student of Karachi University, a victim of non-physical violence.

“At least I tried, although futilely, to access freedom by getting into a prestigious department of my varsity,” she adds woefully.

Regrettably, professionals as learnt and valuable as doctors are prone to this sick, detrimental mentality. A mother of a 2nd year MBBS student shared her views with the Daily Times, and said that now her daughter will get an impressive ‘rishta’ (marriage proposal) as families keep on searching for doctors to get their sons married to. Recently, this norm of getting a doctor ‘bahu’ (daughter-in-law) to make her work like a maid got its share of criticism on legion of social media sites moderated by Pakistani feminists.

An indeed favourable sign is the emergence of exemplary women who advocate women’s rights and freedom. One of them is Mahnaz Rahman, Resident Director Aurat Publication and Information Service Foundation, who till date struggles for the just cause. “Our society is bifurcated into classes and among these classes, the most oppressed is woman. The current circumstance has not come out of the blue; instead, it has historical happenings resulting in suppression of women,” says Rahman.

She said it was the conditioning of thousands of years that has lead to gender inequality to which ‘patriarchal’ structure was to be blamed. Talking of marriage as an institution, which supposedly paves way for women oppression, she asserted that before getting into the social contract, the would-be-spouses should visit counsellors and understand the requirements of a new life ahead. “In this way, the man will comprehend the position of her wife-to-be, and will reckon her equal. On the other hand, they will also get aware of the responsibilities that come with marriage.”

When asked if she still had hopes of seeing things changing for the woman, she said, “Our society is replete with contradictions. There is a girl who gets killed on the pretext of honour when she tries to elope with her lover, and then we have women like Sheema Kirmani, the legendary classical dancer and theatre-performer, who never fears going against the tides. I believe the conditions will certainly change.”

In the words of Rahman, freedom for a woman is ‘independence in making her own decisions, choosing her education, and her participation in politics and state-affairs’.

Syeda Elia, a resident clinical psychologist at the Institute of Clinical Psychology, told Daily Times the reasons behind violence against women. “Violence is nothing but a manifestation of power that the perpetrator likes to establish over the victim. Emotional or physical abuse never develops overnight; there are always telltale signs, a gradual buildup before it becomes evident. A slap here, a public insult there, are usually not addressed, which later turn into full-blown acts of violence,” she said.

A renowned historian of our times, Dr Mubarak Ali, has compiled the history of women oppression in his book ‘Tareekh aur Aurat’ (Woman and History) that introduces its readers to hundreds of years of indoctrination, producing male-dominated morality and violence that follows. Ali has cited several ideologues advocating women suppression: Imam Ghazali, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, and Mowlvi Ashraf Ali Thanvi being few of them.

In his book ‘Ahiya Uloom-ud-Deen’, Ghazali writes, “Marrying for a woman means becoming enslaved; therefore, a wife should appear as a slave to her husband. It is incumbent upon her to remain confined to her husband’s house never leaving for the outside world neither is to be seen by any stranger who can get attracted to her. She is not to answer her husband at any cost and should get adorned only and solely for him.”

At a crucial juncture of sub-continent history when education was being debated as necessary, Syed Ahmed Khan categorically asserted that, “I don’t want you (women of the then Hindustan) to read anything apart from the revealed truth which your mothers have been reading for hundreds of years. The contemporary books penetrating our sacred traditions must be shunned from by you.” Dr Ali has done justice in tracing out the roots of the notion on women oppression’s notion.

We live in society, which has not extricated itself from physical violence against women, let alone the non-physical violence that hampers the progress of women by obfuscating, lying about, and confounding the idea of ‘gender equality’. To the misery of the victims, much is discussed neither in social circles nor in the media to put an end to this sheer injustice.

“Our society is bifurcated into classes and among these classes, the most oppressed is woman. The current circumstance has not come out of the blue; instead, it has historical happenings resulting in suppression of women”

Mahnaz Rahman, Aurat Foundation Resident Director

“Violence is nothing but a manifestation of power that the perpetrator likes to establish over the victim. Emotional or physical abuse never develops overnight; a slap here, a public insult there, are usually not addressed, which later turn into full-blown acts of violence”

Syeda Elia, clinical psychologist

Daily Times

Rethinking Malala’s UN visit

By: Syed Mohammad Ali

The recent speech given by Malala at the UN youth assembly has provoked opposing feelings, which reflect a disturbingly sharp divide in our society.

Malala’s supporters are proud of her bravery, her defiance of the Taliban, and they are impressed by her message of forgiveness, as well as the enormous reception she has got at the UN.

On the other hand, are the numerous denouncements of Malala. Many of those critical of Malala are not unlettered people given that much of this criticism has appeared on social media. Soon after Malala’s UN speech, a plethora of comments began appearing on Twitter and Facebook, calling her an American or a CIA agent. Others blamed the CIA for attacking her, or claimed that her wounds had been faked to tarnish the image of Pakistan. A Taliban leader has subsequently written Malala a letter claiming that the attack on her was provoked by her attempts to malign the Taliban and their cause, rather than her desire to get an education. The letter also suggested that Malala should return home and enrol in a madrassa.

This ongoing controversy surrounding Malala has been noticed abroad as well. For instance, a recent article in Time Magazine claims that there was widespread sympathy for Malala after she was shot, but since then, the mood has turned darker. The article cites a public opinion survey by the Washington-based International Republican Institute which found that a majority of Pakistanis do not blame the Taliban for the attack on Malala. It goes on to assert that conspiracy theories are rife in Pakistan, which are, in turn, blamed on years of dictatorship and suppression of press freedoms. While the article mentions the Raymond Davis incident and drone attacks lending some substance to conspiracy theories and anti-American feelings, it asserts that Pakistanis find it easier to cast blame on external factors and concludes that a major reason that Malala has been spurned as a local hero is her acceptance by the West.

Unfortunately, our own behaviour helps fuel the negative stereotypes about Pakistan abroad. While the UN was marking ‘Malala Day’, the Pakistani government didn’t do much to register the occasion. While some politicians praised her informally, others like the chief minister of Punjab considered her speech somewhat unconvincing by commenting that it was written for global consumption and tried to please everyone.

However, the fact that Malala referred to Buddha, Gandhi, Mandela, Badshah Khan and Mother Teresa was indeed appropriate given that she was speaking at a global forum. Claims that Malala is a secret agent of some sort, or she has defamed Pakistan to get a British passport (Mukhtaran Mai had also faced a similar accusation) are preposterous as well.

If there was anything unsettling about this entire event, it was seeing the UN’s blatant attempt to showcase and parade Malala in the effort to raise its own credibility. Seeing the UN endorsement of Malala’s heroism does seem a bit cringe-worthy given the impotency of the UN in challenging the US invasion of Iraq without a Security Council resolution, or doing much about the ensuing havoc unleashed in Muslim countries around the world since 9/11. Seeing Gordon Brown, the former prime minister of a country with a shameful colonial past, as the Special Envoy for Youth, benevolently praising Malala for her bravery, did not make one feel any better.

It was, however, great to see her back a petition calling for urgent global action to ensure the right of every child to safely attend school and to hear of her plans to devote her life for the education of girls. I am not sure who helped young Malala with her speech, but they could certainly have been a bit more reflexive. Instead of making her sound profusely grateful to the UN for supporting her, it would have been wise to also point out some of the broader global discords which compound problems confronted by ordinary citizens in countries like Pakistan.

Express Tribune

Love marriage claims six lives in Okara village

OKARA: Six people, including twins, were shot dead by 11 people over a marriage issue in Bhajan Ghar village near Hujra Shah Moqeem on Tuesday.

Shahnaz Bibi, d/o Shaukat Mayo, had contracted love marriage with Tahir Sarwar, s/o Sarwar, Kamboh clan, about four yeas ago. After the marriage, Shaukat started creating troubles for the couple. Later, Tahir Sarwar along with his family and wife Shahnaz shifted to Tara Singh village in the suburb of Depalpur town. Tahir and his wife Shahnaz had twins – Adnan Tahir and Fatima — from the wedlock.

On the day of the incident, Shaukat Mayo and his son Husnain alias Papu along with their nine accomplices, including Qayyum, Ibrahim, Afzal, Imran and Arshad, came to the house of Tahir and opened indiscriminate fire. As a result, Tahir, his wife Shahnaz, brother Zahid, twins Adnan Tahir and Fatima and 14-year-old Hamza Kamboh were killed on the spot. Police have registered a case under Sections 302, 109, 148 and 149 of the PPC and arrested one accused Afzal while others are still at large.

The News