Protecting children

Pakistan likes to see itself as a bastion of family values, but this is in large part an illusion — or more properly, a self-deception. Women and children are vulnerable and at risk at every point on the family spectrum. Rape and the sexual abuse of children are reported almost daily across the country. A recent report spoke of the complete absence of a successful prosecution for rape anywhere in the country. Children work in brick kilns from almost as soon as they can walk or carry a load. Women continue to give birth unattended and maternal health in the rural populations is generally poor. Dedicated resources for the protection of children are thinly scattered and scarce to begin with. All of the above is true to a greater or lesser extent but there are brighter spots and Punjab is one of them.

There is, at least, a basic child protection service across Punjab that is backed up by provincial legislation in most large towns and cities. These offices are staffed by trained social workers. In south Punjab, there is a newly built child-protection complex at Rahim Yar Khan and another due to be built in Bahawalpur. These services are going to be further strengthened and improved if a recently agreed action plan goes to fruition. Eleven members of the Punjab Assembly and a range of government officials on July 8 have agreed on an action plan for the protection of child rights and the regulation of child labour and its associated abuses. The plan was formulated over a three-day workshop organised by the Child Rights Movement (CRM) Punjab.

The basic vision is to create a caucus of MPAs within the Punjab Assembly, which would seek to create a broad Punjab Child Protection Policy to be ‘owned’ by the provincial cabinet, which would have the leverage to raise — and keep raising — issues relating to child protection. Ultimately, the goal is the establishment of the Punjab Commission on the Rights of the Child through an act of the provincial assembly.

This is an important move in the right direction for a number of reasons. Perhaps, most importantly, it is the start of what promises to be a holistic rather than a piecemeal approach to child protection, and moreover one that appears to have cross-party support as well as the support and cooperation of the bureaucracy, vital for the success of any move such as this. Secondly, it is going to be able to build on preexisting structures. There are already women health workers scattered across Punjab doing sterling work for little pay or recognition. There are community midwives and Trained Birth Attendants — but not enough of either and the members of the working group are agreed that at least 15,000 more community midwives were needed in rural areas — a formidable challenge in terms of recruitment and resourcing.

Ranging further, the group took in the implementation of the Punjab Protection of Breastfeeding and Child Nutrition (Amendment) Act of 2012; and the implementation of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 to include the appointment of probation officers.

The protection of children — and their mothers — is a complex and multi-dimensional task that crosses a range of agency boundaries and requires some sophisticated joined-up thinking if it is to be addressed adequately. The child protection structures and agencies that we see in developed countries took sometimes hundreds of years to grow, and for legislation to be enacted and implemented, and there are no quick fixes. What we find heartening about the recent moot of those concerned for the development of child protection services is that they were prepared to do some out-of-the-envelope thinking, and that key agencies, both governmental and civil, were all in the same place and reading off the same page. Child protection does not come free either and budgets will have to be committed. This initiative is going to need to be nurtured and protected as carefully as any child, and we wish it both health and prosperity.

Express Tribune

Women empowerment: Denmark pledges $1m for UN programme

ISLAMABAD: The government of Denmark has provided a grant of $1 million to support UN Women, the United Nations entity for gender equality and the empowerment of women.

The Danish government wants to promote peace, security and humanitarian actions shaped by women leadership and participation, stated Ambassador of Denmark Jesper Moller Sorensen during a signing ceremony at the UN Women Country Office on Wednesday.

During the signing ceremony, the ambassador stated that “Today is an important day for us as Denmark pledges its support to a programme which has a new facet to support vulnerable women in Pakistan. This country has unfortunately suffered great losses due to various crises and disasters over the past years where women suffer disproportionately.”

We aim to promote security and protect the rights of women and girls in stabilisation, social reconstruction and peace-building processes through this partnership, he said.

“The programme also aims to ensure that women and girls are engaged as agents of change and promote gender equality commitments in disasters and complex emergencies on both the policy and institutional level,” he said.

The ambassador said that our support to work on gender equality is based on a rights-based approach that focuses on improving women’s access to rights and resources.

UN Women Senior Country Adviser Joana Merlin shared that ‘Women, Peace and Security’ is a central area in crisis situations, irrespective of whether it relates to man-made or natural disasters.

Recent crises affecting the country have highlighted gaps in emergency preparedness, early warning systems and other disaster-reduction and management capacities required for a comprehensive, swift and gender sensitive response towards stabilisation and social reconstruction, she said.

The funding from the Danish government will give continuity to UN Women’s work to ensure that peace, security and humanitarian actions are shaped by participation of women.

Express Tribune

Girl strangled to death: LHC seeks detailed report

The Lahore High Court here on Wednesday taking notice of strangling a girl to death by her two elder brothers and the brother-in-law for marrying a person of her choice directed District & Sessions Judge Sahiwal to look into the matter and submit detailed report within a week. According to details, 21-year-old Allah Mafi, and a Baloch youth, Anser, of her own village ran from their houses and contracted a court marriage in Sahiwal.

Business Recorder

Domestic violence should be a crime

Domestic violence has become a major issue in Pakistan and other subcontinental countries. About 5,000 women are killed in Pakistan from domestic violence with thousands of others maimed or disabled. The Thomson Reuters Foundation ranked Pakistan as the third most dangerous country in the world for women, after Afghanistan and the Democratic Republic of Congo; it is followed by India and Somalia. Domestic violence can be defined in various forms. Domestic violence in plain words means violent or aggressive behaviour within the home, typically involving the violent abuse of a spouse or partner. There are many factors contributing to domestic violence in Pakistan, for instance poverty, illiteracy, social taboos, and that women in society are considered nothing more than second-class citizens.

To understand domestic violence a serious effort has been made by Rutgers-WPF, an international organisation operating from Islamabad. Rutgers recently published a report, which is a complete package as it has prepared recommendations that may help lower domestic violence. The research targets six rural districts of Pakistan, two each from Punjab, Sindh and Balochistan. The research found that 82 percent of women who took part faced domestic violence at some time in their lives and, of these, 63 percent had never sought healthcare for their injuries. The study further illuminated that poverty triggers domestic disputes, which escalate into violence. Men, who are the only bread winners for the household, were inclined to be frustrated in cases where there was no viable source of income. These frustrations are vented out on to family members who demand money from them. The Rutgers study shows that disputes over land distributions also lead to violence. Furthermore, unwanted intercourse during marriage, preference for male children, abuse of alcohol, high numbers of children and watta satta (exchange marriages) are often reasons triggering domestic violence in families.

In Pakistan, India and Bangladesh women have reported attacks ranging from physical to psychological and sexual abuse from partners, in-laws and family members. In 1998 of 1,974 reported murders in the subcontinent, the majority of victims were killed by either family members or in-laws. In 1976, the government of Pakistan introduced a piece of legislation prohibiting dowry and bridal gifts to eliminate such customs but all efforts of the government were in vain due to cultural and societal norms combined with government ineffectiveness. In 1999, the Senate of Pakistan rejected a resolution that would have condemned the practice of murdering women for the sake of family honour. The following year, on April 21, 2000, former President Pervez Musharraf declared that honour killings were “vigorously condemned” by the government and would be treated as murder. Honour killings are still a very common practice, as the recent incident before the main gate of the Lahore High Court shows. It is clear that women in Pakistan are still treated as second-class citizens and men have the right to define their fate.

The previous PPP-led government introduced a bill in 2009 called the Domestic Violence Protection Bill, proposed by PPP parliamentarian Yasmeen Rashid. The bill was passed by the National Assembly (NA) but was quashed in the Senate. It is noteworthy that the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) objected to the bill and said that it would increase the ratio of divorces in the country. Furthermore, it is crucial to mention here that the bill proposed by Yasmeen Rashid noted children and women as the victims of domestic violence while ignoring the elderly and weak men. The CII argued that the punishments suggested by the bill were already enacted by other laws and suggested lack of action on these laws as being the reason for increases in domestic violence.

Since the introduction of the 18th amendment, this subject has become a provincial matter instead of a federal one, and it seems the current government of Punjab has no plan to introduce any legislation protecting women and children in the province. The bill was re-tabled in 2012 but met with a deadlock in parliament because of stiff opposition from the religious right. Representatives of Islamic organisations vowed resistance to the proposed bill, describing it as “anti-Islamic” and an attempt to promote “western cultural values” in Pakistan. They asked for the bill to be reviewed before being approved by parliament. The rise in domestic violence, child abuse and child labour is alarming and increasing day by day. After the 18th amendment, domestic violence fell in the provincial domain but no serious efforts have been made by any provincial assembly to introduce legislation to combat it. One praiseworthy move was made by a PTI provincial assembly member recently, who tabled a bill pertaining to domestic violence in the Punjab assembly; it is still in queue and has yet to come before the members for discussion. At the moment, I do not know whether the Punjab assembly will make any law declaring domestic violence a crime.

In ending, I contend we should take a stand to eliminate domestic violence and ensure equal rights for women in Pakistan. The constitution and Islam promise equal rights to women and there are various examples available on record where the Prophet (PBUH) voiced the importance of equality. Pakistan is a signatory to the world’s main human rights conventions but has never fulfilled its obligations under them. Domestic violence is a crime in western countries but it is yet to be considered a crime here in Pakistan. I have noted that in Pakistan men do not consider beating to be domestic violence while, for me, a single slap is enough to be termed as domestic violence. Domestic violence can only be eliminated from Pakistan if we promote education, challenging the prevalent mind set, which allows domestic violence. I also recommend that, at the individual level, household level, community level and societal level, communication be held disallowing domestic violence. I recommend to the authorities that there is the need of time to enact domestic violence legislation declaring domestic violence a crime. There are several provisions in the Pakistan Penal Code that promise punishment for any kind of violence but declaring domestic violence a separate crime would make the situation easier for women who seek justice from the judiciary. Let us make Pakistan a strong democratic nation where women have the same rights and liberties that are given to men.

Daily Times

Hearing in Farzana case adjourned

LAHORE: An anti-terrorism court on Wednesday summoned the counsel of both parties by July 10 for final arguments on a petition filed by defence counsel challenging the jurisdiction of anti terrorism court in the Farzana case.

The defence counsel argued that the incident had not taken within the limits of the Lahore High Court. He stated that the incident had taken place almost half kilometer away from the court. He quoted a decision of the LHC administration according to which any untoward incident taking place within the premises of LHC would be referred to ATC. He argued that murder case was not a result of an instant act of terrorism but a pre-planned murder as a result of old enmity. He asked how a murder incident which was result of an old enmity could be referred to the ATC. Moreover, he claimed that DIG Investigation Punjab Zulifqar Hameed had already submitted before the LHC that Section 7-ATA did not apply to the instant case so it should be referred to the session courts.

On the other end, the counsel of complainant argued that brutal murder of Farzana had created a wave of fear in the whole country and it had brought shame to the country as well. He said that the way Farzana was murder was atrocious. He implored the court not to delete anti-terrorism sections from the FIR. Moreover, ATC has jurisdiction to trial the said case, the counsel added.

The court after hearing the arguments of both parties adjourned the hearing by July 10 for final arguments. Farzana was stoned to death outside the premises of Lahore High Court on May 27. The Punjab chief minister, following directions of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, had ordered police to refer the case to ATC.

Farzana Iqbal was allegedly stoned to death by her father and two brothers outside the Lahore High Court on May 27 after she was about to appear before the LHC where she waslikely to give her statement in favour of her husband Iqbal with whom she had eloped. Her family claimed that she had married Mazhar Abbas and contracted second marriage without getting divorce from her first husband Mazhar so her second marriage was illegal and un-Islamic.

Police has so far arrested five people in connection with Farzana Bibi case, including her two brothers Zahid Ali and Ghulam Ali, her father Azeem, her former husband Mazhar Abbas and her brother-in-law Jehan Khan.Previously, the court had indicted Farzana’s father Azeem, two brothers Ghulam Ali and Zahid Iqbal, former husband Mazhar Abbas and a cousin, Jahan Khan.

The News