On the frontline: women and children

By: Zahrah Nasir

During their years of occupation of Afghanistan, America has, repeatedly and at every single available opportunity, declared the urgent need for ‘women’s rights’ in a country where, be it inside or outside the home, women and girl children have traditionally had none.

Yet, naturally given the obscenely exploitative circumstances created by international interference in a country where they have no right to be, these self-same forces of global greed conveniently closed their mouths and their troops their eyes – when bombing, killing, maiming and otherwise murdering and rendering homeless those they so publicly declared must be saved at all – and any – cost.

Now though, having lost a war and further decimated a country and a people, who had already suffered more than enough, America is going all out – publicly now that formerly ‘secret’ negotiations are well and truly out of the closet – to reinstall the very ‘terrorists’ they raced headlong into Afghanistan to throw out which, no matter from what angle it is examined, is absolutely and disgustingly ludicrous in the extreme.

It is true to say that Afghanistan needs peace, especially so in the wake of American created mayhem that saw the installation of a shockingly corrupt puppet presidency in which warlords and drug-dealing criminals ruled the roost, but setting about enforcing the return of the ‘dreaded’ – certainly by women – Taliban is certainly no way to go about it.

Those with means, education and a measure of understanding of what the ‘armies of liberation’ intended to inflict as a retaliatory parting gesture, have, over the last year or two and even more so during the last six months, desperately been seeking ways and means of getting out before everything hits the fan – again.

And, knowing full well that females will immediately face serious problems and a possible return to the medieval madness some have already endured once, women who have come to value whatever lives they have been able to carve out for themselves, are already on the run.

Widows, these, as a direct result of over 30 years of continuous warfare in one guise or another, are numerous and already find it extremely difficult to survive in a society where, aside from in a few agricultural regions, they are relatively new members of an earning workforce.

Underpaid and overworked as they often are, these women currently have the dignity of being able to, if they work damn hard, earn enough to support their families and pay for some kind of roof over their collective heads. But the return of the Taliban will delete all of this. And what the hell are these widows supposed to do then?

Even packing up their meagre possessions, picking up their children and attempting to flee to Pakistan – a country that no longer welcomes Afghan refugees – is way beyond the means of most.

Young women, those who were children during the previous Taliban rule, who have since emerged and fought tooth and nail against accepted Afghan tradition and progressed, some of them working part-time to pay costs, through school and college to university and good jobs and who have become used to certain measures of freedom – a freedom that would not be considered much at all by American or even by general global standards – will be first up against the bloody wall of intolerance and subjugation and yet, this is a terrible truth, not a single government, American or otherwise, has so far seen fit to express even a modicum of concern about the inevitable fate of female Afghans quite irrespective of their ethnicity which is, given that ethnic Hazaras for example have, until recently, been treated as slaves, a sickening state of affairs indeed.

It is also pertinent to point out – and this is extremely sad – that the vast majority of expatriate Afghans, scattered around the world as they are and a huge percentage of them not having set foot in their ancestral land for many, many years if ever at all, are going all-out gung-ho in lauding this latest American betrayal that will, if it brings anything at all, most definitely not result in any acceptable, to the indigenous Afghan majority, form of that sought of grail so lovingly referred to as ‘peace’.

The writer has authored a book titled “The Gun Tree: One Woman’s War” and lives in Bhurban.

The Nation

The many faces of domestic violence

By: Maria Kari

According to a World Health Organisation (WHO) report released this week, physical and sexual violence now affects a third of women worldwide. The consequences of this includes a myriad of health problems, including broken bones, bruises, pregnancy complications and depression, coupled with the harsh reality that many of these women may possibly spend their lifetimes in such relationships.

Last year, a host of high-profile rape cases in India helped shed the spotlight on the pandemic of sexual violence against women. Though we have a long way to go and much responsibility to bear, as a society, the immediate result has been incremental yet positive.

More recently, this week, the world was shocked by pictures of art collector husband Charles Saatchi publicly grabbing the throat of his celebrity wife, chef Nigella Lawson, in what he would shamelessly describe later on as a “playful tiff”.

Like everyone else who has seen these degrading photos, my first reaction was: where was everyone and why did no one intervene? After all, the couple was out in public, surrounded by many, as they lunched at their favourite restaurant where they have been photographed countless times.

Despite Lawson looking visibly upset in the presence of many onlookers, including customers, paparazzi and staff, who craned their necks and watched in shock, everyone seemed to be unable or unwilling to intervene or call for help.

Although Lawson has not yet filed a police report, once the pictures went viral, the police issued a caution to Saatchi (who accepted it because he did not want it “hanging” over them). The Community Safety Unit, which deals with hate crime and domestic violence in the UK, is also making inquiries.

While it is undeniably intimidating to intervene on an obviously private matter taking place between a powerful celebrity couple, the fear on her face and the tears in her eyes — as pictures also show — coupled with her silence since that day, are unsettling.

No doubt, stories of celebrity domestic abuse have been instructive in raising awareness and breaking societal taboos. In 2009, Rihanna’s assault by her then-boyfriend Chris Brown, which left her battered and bruised, brought the realities of dating violence to the forefront, making the songstress an unintentional example for many women worldwide.

But why is it that we, as a society, only really sit up in shock and are outraged when one of the following happens: a woman is treated excessively brutally and left for dead or when photos of a rich, famous and beautiful woman under assault are exposed?

As co-author of the WHO report, Claudi Garcia-Moreno, states (speaking in context of the brutal gang rape in New Delhi), “these kinds of cases raise awareness, which is important, [but] at the same time, we must remember there are hundreds of women every day, who are being raped on the streets and in their homes, but that doesn’t make the headlines”.

If the WHO report is anything to go by, then 25 per cent of women worldwide are currently trapped in abusive relationships. And unlike the Nigella Lawsons and the Rihannas of the world, many of these women wouldn’t have the financial means to support themselves, or the freedom to walk away should they decide to do so.

Regardless of whether it is an isolated incident or a repeated offence and regardless of the degree, amount and frequency of abuse being inflicted on the victim, the vulnerability and the silence of our fellow sisters should be enough cause for concern.

The Express Tribune

Women on boards

By: Arif Zaman

Countries continue to respond to the global economic crisis with increased engagement in corporate governance reform. An area in which the momentum for change has increased is the composition of boards. A significant shift in achieving the changes to the way boards perform lies in the appointment of women in senior leadership roles. The increased spotlight on women’s participation at the senior levels steers economic and political activity and acknowledges the importance of gender diversity on boards. Women constitute half the potential talent base globally. Thus, their economic participation is probably the most efficient way of reducing the gender gap in individual countries, leading to increased competitiveness and GDP growth. The correlation between gender equality and higher levels of competitiveness is consistent with increasing evidence that employing women is an efficient use of national human talent.

As the Commonwealth Secretariat has noted, “Persistent inequalities in gender undermine overall economic growth and the productivity of member countries.” As this argument applies to the corporate market, there is compelling research to demonstrate that organisations with more gender-diverse boards outperform their male-dominated counterparts.

Within the Commonwealth there is a disparity between different regions, underpinned by various factors. Countries demonstrate different levels of investment in female education, but examining the female economic contribution reveals a consistent lack of return on investment. The underemployment of highly qualified women impedes the growth potential of economies across the Commonwealth. The Global Gender Rankings prepared for the World Economic Forum in 2012 present only one Commonwealth country in the top 10 (New Zealand) and three more in the top 20 (Lesotho, UK and South Africa). To present a review on the status of women in senior leadership positions across the Commonwealth is challenging. The regional disparity in the numbers of women in senior leadership reflects different attitudes and levels of support for promoting this talent.

The well-rehearsed arguments presenting barriers to progression range from insufficient visibility to a lack of opportunities, networks and a recruitment system that does not have enough credibility to support female candidates. These barriers can be surmounted by an infrastructure identifying talent for senior roles.

A major ACCA report on the global drivers of change emphasises the wider context noting that ‘the business landscape is being reshaped by a combination of market volatility, globalisation and transformational innovation. The impact of these challenges is compounded by rapid advances in science and technology, demographic shifts and disruptive new business models. Collectively, these forces of change are driving new societal values, needs and expectations’. Set against this the report argues, ‘there is a growing recognition in business of the need to develop a rigorous understanding of these and other emerging drivers of change and to prepare for a range of possible future scenarios’. One way to capitalise on the opportunities from such change is through more diverse boards.

As economies across the Commonwealth comprise different business structures, there are various routes for women to navigate to board positions. Diversity on boards is broader than the corporate world and this means extending searches to women from the public sector and those in entrepreneurial and family firms. There are, however, still significant challenges in consistently recruiting highly-skilled women.

The 30 percent rule has been widely accepted as the baseline level for the proportion of women on boards to be sufficient to have an impact. This requires a substantial increase in supply. Recruitment of women in senior leadership positions requires a dedicated plan to ensure there is steady supply of highly skilled and aspiring women for the future.

Disjointed methods adversely affect confidence in business performance. The trajectory of female progress through the labour market is well documented, with approximately equal numbers of men and women at the graduate level dwindling to single figures for women in middle and senior management. This is also replicated in other areas, such as the public sector and political spheres.

The data on global gender trends demonstrates that investing in education is a means of eradicating poverty and addressing the social and cultural barriers impeding female economic engagement.

Industrialised economies demonstrate clear benefits from investment in female education and the trend now is to enable greater female participation across the whole range of leadership paths in businesses. This requires girls to have a much better understanding of how their education choices affect career opportunities and to understand which skills are most effective for boardroom appointments. Alongside these developments are increasing opportunities for flexible working and parental leave rights. A challenge on the horizon for industrialised economies facing an ageing population will be how women, who are still primary carers for their ageing relatives, will combine work and domestics responsibilities at the other end of their careers.

Recruitment of women to board positions has been significantly successful in countries offering a range of comprehensive support for women, including leadership positions with increased visibility; building leadership capacity; encouraging organisations to support talent proactively and having a strong educational base. All these factors create the ideal environment for enabling access to senior leadership and board positions.

Challenging business and social norms requires comprehensive reviews of key interventions and ensuring that the changes are implemented systematically. This requires firms to reconsider how they do business and how they present themselves as employers of choice to the brightest graduates. The financial impact of more women in decision-making roles will become evident over the longer term. Countries that have achieved a higher proportion of women in senior leadership positions have given women much greater visibility. The presence of successful women not only helps to raise aspirations, but also starts the process of presenting diverse boardrooms as the norm rather than exception.

The writer is an adviser to the Commonwealth Business Council.

The News

‘Torture’ of two constables: Police raid village, beat women

By: MOHAMMAD ASGHAR

RAWALPINDI: A large number of policemen searched Dhoke Kashmirian on Saturday and Sunday, took a villager into custody, and allegedly beat women in retaliation to the torturing of two policemen of the ‘Tiger Squad’.

The two policemen had suffered bruises and were only released after villagers telephoned the Pakistan Muslim League-N’s (PML-N) member of provincial assembly, Shaukat Bhatti.

They had asked the MPA to get a case registered against the two policemen for attempted robbery.

However, the police refused to obey the MPA stating that the villagers had violated the law by torturing the policemen who were on a night patrolling duty. The police asked Mr Bhatti to contact some senior officer or the City Police Officer (CPO) in this regard.

Refuting the villagers’ claims, the police registered a criminal case against the alleged tortures for unlawfully detaining law enforcement officials, and for snatching their arms and motorbike.

According to the officials, policemen associated with the Tiger Squad had signaled a van to stop at Thakra Moor (Mandra) for search on Saturday morning.

However, the van driver ignored the police and sped off.

In response, four policemen with two motorbikes decided to chase the fleeing driver, but one of the bikes did not start on time.

As a result, only two constables, identified as Mubeen Jamal and Waqas Masood, chased the driver.

Both constables managed to catch up with the van but it had already entered Dhoke Kashmirian, and the driver, seeing the police at his tail, had telephoned his relatives in the area informing them that he was in trouble.

Therefore, when the two policemen reached the area, villagers appeared on the scene and attacked the two policemen. They then detained both officials for more than two hours, tortured them and snatched their SMGs and the motorbike.

The police said the villagers had later staged a ‘drama’ while informing the local MPA that they had captured two policemen who were trying to rob their homes. They asked the MPA to direct the police and register a case against the two officials.

Reportedly, MPA Mr Bhatti directed the police to register a case against the two constables and following his intervention, the villagers released the two policemen, their weapons and their motorbike.

However, preliminary investigations strengthened the constables’ claim that they had been tortured, and a case was registered against the villagers instead.

When the police reached the village on Saturday evening, they found all the accused missing and their houses locked.

However, one person, Bashir Butt, was found hiding under a charpoy (woven bed) and was picked up by the police.

During the search, the police faced strong retaliation from women villagers who stoned the police, and in response, they beat up the women.

As the police had returned without apprehending the accused, raids continued on Sunday as well, but without success.

When contacted, the station house officer (SHO) Jatli, Nazir Ahmed, said one of the accused (Bashir Butt) identified in the First Investigation Report had been apprehended, while raids were underway to capture others who had a long history of crime.

Inspector Nazir Ahmed, while referring to the MPA’s intervention in the matter, said political people should support their voters but nobody would be allowed to attack the police and violate the law.

DAWN