A woman stronger than any man

Benazir Bhutto had done what male leaders could not do; she convinced a dictator to have talks, made him take off his military uniform and resign as the army chief

Living in a conservative society, it is quite rare in female folk to find an individual to stand tall against rules and conventions of society, through which it blatantly defines the norms of social behaviour. It is almost impossible to find a messiah determined to change such a society. Regrettably, Pakistan has always been besieged by nasty autocrats, who suppressed the nation without abiding by any constitution or rule of law. It is even more pitiable that men who are considered stronger and for whom this society is being called male-dominated had failed to get this country out of the bog of dictatorship. During the dictatorial regimes, when women were subjugated, laws were written specifically to discriminate against them and were strictly enforced, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s daughter Benazir emerged as the real leader and Daughter of the East, determined to get oppressed people out of the gray twilight that knew neither victory nor defeat; resolute to win glorious triumphs in her war for emancipation of poor people from the grip of dictatorship.

After the conspiracy and trial of Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Benazir Bhutto was arrested repeatedly, tortured, was put to test and trial, and ultimately went into exile. Albeit she could choose a luxurious life, staying outside the country forever, but as Bhuttos were known for their sincerity to the people, therefore she did not leave the people in the lurch to face the brutality of a dictator. She did not give up, endured all hardships, paving the way for the rise of real democracy. When no man could dare to challenge the military coup, only Benazir did. She, proceeding despite a risk of possible dangers, ventured into the world of politics, struggling in a narrow-minded society against military and mullah alliances. Being gravely criticised by the politically motivated mullahs, who were against women’s progress and their fundamental rights, she never lost hope and became a symbol of respect of women all over the world, and turned into a unique leader, performing better than the male elements in society. She showed the way to women in Pakistan to stand up for their rights, of others, and stood fast against dictatorship and atrocities. All military regulations had failed to stop her — the prison cells, torture, guns, teargas, criticism, abuse — all had failed to shake her plans. Political forces may not have, but the masses had stood beside her, and with their immense support, she swept the general elections in 1988, succeeding in capturing power against the agents of the dictatorship.

History is a witness that one man’s rule had failed to consolidate itself due to the struggle that she conducted, and faced the most hated dictator in our history who had killed her father. Facing dictators and tyrannical establishments, she always stood victorious due to the existence of her stupendous strategies.

The dictator General Zia and the parties of the Pakistan National Alliance, calling themselves Islamic, all assembled against Benazir and the so-called democrats became protégés of the military regime. She fought all those dirty forces alone, which were not bothered about any rule of the game, and nakedly using all weapons to finish their political enemies. Undoubtedly, she beat them all.

Benazir Bhutto had done what male leaders could not do; she convinced a dictator to have talks, made him take off his military uniform and resign as the army chief. This historical achievement had become possible through her intellectual politics. However, not only the dictators, also the so-called democratic parties had put all efforts to humiliate her and despoil her favourable policies during her regimes. She, despite being a democratically elected prime minister, had to face the military establishment and the opposition, which was definitely devoid of principled politics, completely supported by the establishment. Rivals of the PPP, solely interested in personalised power, had always been adopting myopic policies to damage the country. Nevertheless, despite such mean acts of the establishment and political competitors, Benazir Bhutto became the most powerful voice of the people of Pakistan.

Despite the crackdowns on the democratic process, Benazir remained loyal to her cause. She was not among those so-called democratic leaders who seek apologies from dictators in order to save their own lives and families but do not dare to challenge coups. Even while remaining in exile, Ms Bhutto strove for a democratic Pakistan. Where were other political forces when she, despite being a woman, had fought alone against the brutal General Zia; stood alone against General Musharraf; raised voice and protested when the Chief Justice was deposed; dared to speak against terrorists who unleashed a spate of havoc in Pakistan? Where were the men, calling themselves the only flag-bearers of democracy, when the constitution was suspended and amended into virtual nonexistence, during the dictatorial regimes?

I stand in a daze; why are men considered stronger if they had not been to battles when that brave woman was fighting alone against everything? If today we are free to speak our minds then it is just because of Benazir Bhutto, who made the evolutionary transition of our society from a ‘traditional’ to a ‘modern’ one, and she was the only leader to inspire all to rise against oppression. I thank her for being our voice and making this society comfortable to exist in. She will always be missed. Rest in peace Bibi…

Daily Time

Acid attacks on women

Acid, cheap and easily available, is the quickest weapon to destroy a woman’s life. This comes handy in Cambodia, Afghanistan, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and other nearby countries. Globally, at least 1,500 people in 20 countries are attacked in this way every year, 80 percent of whom are women and somewhere between 40 and 70 percent of them are under 18 years of age.

In South Asia, people use acid to attack their victims as a form of revenge for refusal of sexual advances, proposals of marriage and demands for dowry. In November 2008, extremists subjected schoolgirls in Afghanistan to acid attacks for attending school. In Cambodia, it was reported that these attacks were mostly carried out by wives against their husbands’ lovers. In 2006, a group in Gaza calling itself ‘Just sword of Islam’ claimed to have thrown acid at young women who were dressed ‘immodestly’ and warned other women to wear hijab. In India, acid attacks on women who dared to refuse a man’s proposal of marriage or asked for divorce are a common form of revenge. The number of acid attacks has been rising in India and there have been 68 reported acid attacks in the state of Karnataka since 1999.

Tom O’Neil of National Geographic reported that acid throwing is also used to enforce the caste system in modern India, where upper caste individuals often attack Dalits for supposedly violating the order.

According to a Rand Corporation commentary, hundreds of women in Pakistan and Afghanistan have been blinded or maimed when acid was thrown on their unveiled faces by male fanatics who considered them improperly dressed. Attacks or threats of attacks on women who do not wear hijab or otherwise ‘immodestly dressed’ have been reported in other countries as well. The government must rise to the occasion and do its utmost to put a stop to this barbaric practice by dealing sternly with those who take recourse to such an inhuman practice, and make availability of acids next to impossible.

Daily Time

Reading men (and women)

The writer is a defence analyst who retired as an air vice-marshal in the Pakistan Air Force
If ever there is a form of existence that has taught me more about life and its manifestations, it has been simply observing and reading men dealing with life’s vicissitudes. There are essentially two kinds in my grammar of things: those that go with the flow, and the few who will tend to venture out every now and then, create a spark that could either ignite the spirit to new vistas or simply burn down whatever was already there. It is the second type of man that has held my interest through the years. God knows, I have saved a few in my life from ignominious end to what I knew could be exceptional careers if ever a moment arrived when something out of the ordinary was needed. It may have been exceptionally long-term hedging, but without it can you ever have a Malik Riaz rise from the ashes of ordinariness?

Here are a few examples that we all are familiar with: My most favourite from the great land of Americas are the Clintons — and I say this in all seriousness. America hasn’t had a sharper president in recent years. He dealt with the most difficult global issues plaguing his time in office with a classy ease. Whether it was war, or the international stage to forge peace, or to envision ‘globalisation’ which would underwrite the future of the world, he waltzed his way through with that great elegance of his. And yet, yet, there was time for fun. Whitewater, the Health policy woes, the shutdown of the government, the threat of his impeachment, were all taken in stride. His comfort level was such with his surroundings that even a moment’s escapade, be it in the adjacent pantry to the Oval Office or the search to find his quarry in a tumult, gave him that opportunity to explore and venture beyond the routine. In fact, the closing down of the government gave him even greater time for other engagements. Full marks for creativity. Look at his voluminous biography; is there another in recent times, from 40 to 44, that can present itself with such great depth; and simple intellectual brilliance? I am certain he would have led America brilliantly in another World War. He would have surely been on my side if I ever had anything to do with him.

Hillary is another type; consummately intelligent, but too organised for my flavour. She had the good sense to keep the errant Bill around for better times. She is ‘planned’ — in a good way; and, knows her ‘smart’ from the rest. She may be tiring a bit now, but wow, what a couple. Explosive, in all manners of saying. But put them against Articles 62 and 63 of our Constitution, and they don’t make it. Good, they weren’t born in Pakistan.

I will leave Barack Obama out. He is work in progress and given what he had at inauguration of 2009, a possibility to begin with a clean slate, he chose to retain the filthy one that Bush, the squanderer, left. No, I wouldn’t have noticed him in the middle of a mob unless, of course, he had to make the speech at a convention. My other problem with him — he is compulsively over-rehearsed, even with his self-written speeches; there are no moments of a ‘city on the hill’. May be he will be back and maybe that is good for America given their current crop of options, but nay, he couldn’t lead America in a World War. Heck, he can’t extract America out of one in Afghanistan.

Of the recent Indian lot, only Vajpayee ji was the right kind. Most other Indians, I have met are the type that I have always expected them to be: staid, serious — too serious, a little unsure, perhaps a bit insecure, wary and apprehensive, untrusting; simply unwilling to hang out for longer than a drink; much more the regular types. Vajpayee was different and that is why he ventured out to Pakistan. By Indian standards, he was reckless; almost agreed to putting to rest the mockery that rules India and Pakistan. But then, he hit the proverbial ‘wall’ of the Indian Establishment with some help from Musharraf, and things never changed. Nehru, again, was the right kind. Sure, suave, sophisticated, with a well functioning mind which was clear and well directed too. In India, as in Pakistan, mostly systems have governed, not men and that shows in a lack of any ‘spark’ or enterprise in their societies and especially within their establishment structures. Exception should be made for Bhutto and Benazir.

But why do I take this road at all? Thanks to Malik Riaz and his nemesis, Arsalan Iftikhar, Pakistan is in the midst of another ‘gate’. I will leave young Arsalan to his father and let them sort matters out between them, but I find Malik Riaz fascinating. He is what he says he is; make of it what you want. Show me the one who may have earned his riches by staying on the straight and narrow. But is there another who has brought and put in place twenty-first century living within the reach of ordinary Pakistanis. He, to my mind, is a creator of sorts and brings dreams to reality. In doing so, the ordinary people have only gotten better. Others hold onto their precious swathes of real estate, he converts ordinary land into real estate. Real estate is precious only when it is used; unused, it remains only potentially precious. How he may get it is another story and needs to be ruthlessly regulated. Among all the rascals that man this land of ours, he is a productive rascal. No question, he must pay for his latest and other crimes, if proven. As must others who begun to get in as the net widens.

Here is the recommended list of punishments that the courts may consider: charge him to make up for the power shortages that debilitate Pakistan today; he should introduce and develop hygienic housing for our village folk in villages that surround major cities; a part of his wealth should be used to set up technology towns in parts of Pakistan where the bulging youth population should find its future. Were he to do this under the watchful eye of the Superior Courts, we would wish him even greater wealth and riches. He needs to be preserved, gainfully employed with his enterprise and not wasted. Any takers.

Express Tribune

Three women burnt alive

KHAN GARH – Three women were burn alive here the other day. They were sent to Nishter Hospital. The police have registered a case against the culprits.

As per detail, Shabana was sleeping in her house with her mother Sakina and daughter Nusrat and nephew Nagena here .in Basti Lang a adjoining area of Khan Garh. Suddenly, they wake up by some noise and they saw Nadir, Sarfraz, Tayab, Saifullah and 2 unknown people sprinkling oil on them.

The Nation

Supreme Court disposes of Kohistan girls’ killing case

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Wednesday disposed of a suo motu notice taken on reported killing of five Kohistan girls, after it was apprised that all of them were alive and there was no truth in the claims made over incident.

A three-judge bench of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Jawwad S Khawaja and Justice Khilji Arif Hussain disposed of the matter after finding a report compiled by the investigation team as satisfactory.

The bench observed that the investigative teams comprising a civil female judge Bushra Gauhar MNA, and Farzana Bari NGO representative were sent twice to the area to learn about the truth as highlighted by media.

The Chief Justice also reiterated that holding of Jirgas was illegal and unconstitutional. He also thanked the Adviser on Interior Affairs Rehman Malik and the local administration for their cooperation in the case.

The bench said that the statement given by Muhammad Afzal, brother of two men who filmed the video, could not establish their claims.Afzal’s brother Bin Yasir and Gul Nazar, had allegedly filmed the event on their mobile phone and uploaded it on a web site.

The court had taken notice after surfacing of media report that the local clerics had allegedly issued edicts for the killing of four women for clapping when two young men were dancing at a wedding ceremony in Kohistan.

The News